Machines informing financial positions and investments. Are we simply moving forward with new technology or we are just down right lazy?

, , No Comments


picture: www.hitc.com


Machines informing financial positions and investments. Are we simply moving forward with new technology or we are just down right lazy?

While our past is cast in stone and unchangeable and our present is an ongoing phenomenon; our future however is more uncertain. Nowhere else are the consequences of these uncertainties more significant than the world of investment banking. Within the investment banking area, particularly in the light of artificial intelligence (machine learning), there are two critical Investment banking products to consider: Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and equity stock markets (shares).

Let us consider M&As as they were done previously, companies (medium and large scale) required the services of industry experts to identify the best fit M&A companies and provide a web of information needed for the closure of deals. With shares in the past, the biggest challenge for stock traders was predicting stock prices and market trends in the financial equity market to maximize returns. One of Warren Buffet’s more inspiring quotes, “It’s easier to look back than to look into the future’’, emphasizes the difficulty in predicting stock behavior. In those days, stock trades involved buying stocks on a physical trading floor and required a network of persons to execute a trade, with traders relying more on bare intuition and basic trend analytic tools. These all happened in the analog world!!

In the digital age of today, there are different algorithms and indicators that have been developed to change interaction between buyers and sellers. Buyers can find a best fit company in a matter of hours, saving them the cost of research and precious time. The use of artificial intelligence tools such as machine learning and big data have emerged with several programs.  These programs obtain as much available historical data about a company and seek to create a relationship between this historical data and future prices of the shares of the company. To achieve this, investors and researchers create different algorithms (decision trees, support vector machines, Naive Bayes classifiers, etc.) and price indicators. Some of these algorithms have been designed to be so intelligent that they are not rigid to any single investment approach but adapt to market trends and situations.
All this is not to say that traditional investment banking as was practiced in the ‘analog world’ is dead. In fact, very intelligent and experienced bankers and traders are still very relevant in the process of negotiating and structuring deals to reduce tax payments and place stock trades based on knowledge of future occurrences. A valid question though is: “How much longer will human experience still be required?’ Currently, a tech start-up based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA called Kensho has received a lot of buzz and huge investments from large corporations such as Goldman Sachs, Google ventures and Consumer News and Business Channel (CNBC) for its development of a software called Warren. Kensho believes that Warren will replace financial analysts in investments transactions. The company boasts of the capacity of Warren to search financial data and reports and provide replies in natural language within seconds.

I have a friend, George, back home in Nigeria. He is one of the hundreds of thousands of investment bankers in the world. Does this mean he is going to be jobless in the near future? I know machines are smart or can be programmed to be smart, but we all realize the intuition of humans and the capacity of mankind to reason through complex and confusing situations. In such situations, simple algorithms may fail, especially the situation that has not obeyed the rules. Take for instance, the earthquake and Tsunami in Japan in 2011 (deemed the costliest natural disaster in history). Then you need a human, then you need someone like my friend George. Now, I am not in anyway suggesting that technology is not the way forward. However, in going forward technologically, we need to allow for man to move machine and machine to listen to man. After all, even unmanned space shuttles are still “manned” by men on Earth.



References
Walters, Richard 2015 Investor rush to artificial intelligence is real deal http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/019b3702-92a2-11e4-a1fd-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3oG7w4n00 Financial Times 4th January 2015

The Economist 2015 Artificial intelligence: Rise of the machines
http://www.economist.com/node/21650526/print1/13Artificialintelligence 
The Economist 5th August 2015


0 comentarios:

Post a Comment